top of page
Shelly Bergeron

The Red Zone: Why Red Dye No. 3 Is Under Fire




The FDA and Red Dye No. 3: What You Need to Know:


The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is considering a ban on Red Dye No. 3 (erythrosine), a synthetic food coloring commonly found in the U.S. food supply. This move reflects growing concerns about the dye’s potential health risks, as well as increased advocacy from consumer groups and heightened regulatory scrutiny at both state and federal levels.

If enacted, the ban would represent a significant step forward in food safety, impacting manufacturers and potentially changing the options available to consumers.


What Is Red Dye No. 3?

Red Dye No. 3 is a petroleum-derived synthetic coloring used to create bright, cherry-red hues in a variety of products. While Red 40 is more widely used, Red Dye No. 3 is often found in:

  • Candies: Think seasonal treats and confections.

  • Baked Goods: Frostings, fillings, and packaged pastries.

  • Snack Foods: Certain cereals, gummies, and fruit-flavored snacks.

  • Medications: Syrups, tablets, and lozenges.


Its affordability and vibrant color have made it a favorite among manufacturers for decades. However, growing health concerns and the availability of safer alternatives have put it under the microscope.


The History of Red Dye No. 3 Regulation

Concerns about Red Dye No. 3 are not new. In 1990, the FDA banned its use in cosmetics and topical medications after studies linked it to thyroid tumors in lab animals. Yet, despite these concerns, it has remained approved for use in food and certain medications.

Why Is Red Dye No. 3 Under Scrutiny?

Key factors driving the FDA’s renewed focus include:

  1. Animal Studies: Research from the 1980s suggested a link between high doses of Red Dye No. 3 and thyroid tumors in lab rats. While these findings don’t directly apply to humans, they raise valid safety concerns.

  2. Behavioral Impacts: Studies have explored links between synthetic food dyes and behavioral issues in sensitive populations, such as children. Although evidence isn’t conclusive, some research highlights potential risks worth further investigation.

  3. State and Global Action: California’s 2023 Food Safety Act banned Red Dye No. 3 and other additives starting in 2027. Additionally, countries like Norway and many in the European Union have already prohibited the dye, adopting a more precautionary approach.

  4. Consumer Advocacy: Groups advocating for safer, natural ingredients have pressured regulators and manufacturers to phase out synthetic dyes, including Red Dye No. 3.


Potential Health Risks

Cancer Concerns

Studies linking Red Dye No. 3 to thyroid tumors in lab rats have prompted questions about its safety. While the doses in these studies were much higher than typical human exposure, scientists debate whether any level of risk is acceptable in food additives.

Neurodevelopmental Risks

Some research suggests synthetic food dyes may affect behavior and cognitive function in children. For example, a 2007 study published in The Lancet found a correlation between artificial dyes and hyperactivity in children. This prompted the European Union to require warning labels on products containing these dyes.

Allergic Reactions

Although rare, some individuals report sensitivities to Red Dye No. 3, experiencing symptoms like skin irritation, headaches, or respiratory issues. These reactions emphasize the need for caution, especially in sensitive populations.


Why This Matters to Me as a Functional Medicine Health Coach

As a functional medicine health coach, I’m all about helping people uncover what’s holding them back from feeling their absolute best. And let me tell you, Red Dye No. 3 isn’t doing anyone any favors. Think of it as the sneaky saboteur lurking in your kids’ candy or that bright pink frosting on your favorite cupcake. Sure, it looks fun, but at what cost?

For kids, artificial dyes can act like little chaos agents, potentially fueling hyperactivity or behavioral shifts. Ever wonder why your child suddenly morphs into a mini tornado after a sugary snack? It might not just be the sugar — Red Dye No. 3 could be stirring the pot. And for adults, these synthetic additives can quietly contribute to health concerns like inflammation or hormone imbalances, keeping you from achieving that vibrant, energetic life you deserve.

Let’s face it, food dyes aren’t the superhero ingredients we hoped for — they’re more like the food world’s villains, sneaking around in brightly colored disguises. When we cut out unnecessary additives like Red Dye No. 3, we’re giving our bodies one less thing to fight against, and who doesn’t want to make life a little easier for their thyroid or their kid’s developing brain?


What Would a Ban Mean?

If the FDA moves forward with a ban, manufacturers would need to:

  • Reformulate Products: Many would turn to natural alternatives, such as beet juice or paprika extract, which may increase costs and affect product taste or shelf life.

  • Adjust Operations: Reformulations, updated packaging, and supply chain changes could lead to higher production costs.

  • Meet New Standards: Companies would face compliance deadlines and potential penalties for non-compliance.

How Can You Reduce Exposure to Red Dye No. 3?

While we wait for regulatory decisions, there are steps you can take to limit synthetic dye exposure:

  • Read Labels: Look for “no artificial colors” or plant-based alternatives.

  • Choose Clean-Label Brands: Support companies that prioritize transparency and minimal processing.

  • Advocate for Safer Foods: Engage in campaigns encouraging manufacturers and regulators to prioritize food safety.

For parents, reducing children’s intake of artificially colored snacks and beverages can lead to a more balanced and healthful diet. Plus, you’ll thank yourself when those post-candy tornado tantrums start to fade.


A Step Toward Transparency

The discussion around Red Dye No. 3 highlights a broader shift toward greater transparency and accountability in food production. As consumers demand cleaner, safer foods, manufacturers are being encouraged to rethink their ingredient choices and labeling practices.


Conclusion

The FDA’s potential reconsideration of Red Dye No. 3 reflects the importance of reevaluating food additives in light of emerging scientific evidence. While synthetic dyes won’t disappear overnight, this could mark a significant step toward stronger food safety standards and consumer protection.

By staying informed and making mindful choices, we can support a healthier, more transparent food system for everyone. And remember, food doesn’t need to look like a bright electric rainbow to nourish your body — it just needs to be real, clean, and supportive of the amazing human you are.

Recent Posts

See All

Comments


bottom of page